These cards (see below) were given to us by a former Worcester Election Official who found them blowing around the streets and on sidewalks on Saturday.
Putting the words "Worc Public Schools" on election material is clearly a violation of election law.
If the handwriting on these cards is shown to be that of Worcester Public Schools teacher Lisa Perlman, she will have a bit of explaining to do.
John Mahoney will also need to explain why an endorser (see endorsement card below) and campaign volunteer is violating Election Law on his behalf.
Friday, October 29, 2010
WCCA TV13 has posted the 13th Worcester Debate.
This is the debate that John Mahoney did not attend because he needed to be at the Tatnuck Neighborhood Network meeting with Airport Officials. A meeting at which he was not a speaker, was not announced as a guest and at which he asked no questions.
Today on the Jim Polito show, Jim undorsed John Mahoney for dodging debates and for taking Special Interest money. He said that means that Mahoney will be putting the business of the SEIU first if he goes to Beacon Hill.
Mike Benedetti did the same during the primary but for a different reason. Mahoney spammed him during his city council run and Mike said that no one should vote for him as dog catcher much less district rep. Mike did this on his show "508 - a show about Worcester" program. He calls him 'Spamming John Mahoney'.
Today the Boston Globe made the case we’ve been making all along: We need more Republicans on Beacon Hill to restore political balance and root out corruption.
CLICK HERE to read today's editorial in the Globe and please share with your friends and family.
Yours In Victory-
Jennifer A. Nassour, Esq.
Chairman
Massachusetts Republican Party
The work of the state Legislature lies at the heart of governance in Massachusetts, and voters on Nov. 2 face important decisions in selecting candidates for the Senate and House of Representatives who have the experience, temperament and vision necessary to improve the political climate on Beacon Hill.
Many, including this newspaper, have been critical of the Legislature’s work over the years, and it is not difficult to find examples of ethical shortcomings among our political class. Correcting those faults would be aided by greater political balance in a body that is overwhelmingly Democratic in its makeup, because one-party rule is rarely if ever conducive to good government.
However, party affiliation alone does not explain Beacon Hill’s problems, and simply electing more Republicans is no guarantee of more effective government in Massachusetts. What’s needed is an assembly of serious-minded candidates who can work together in a Legislature that will feature many new faces, but will surely remain firmly in Democratic hands. A coalition of Republicans and fiscally conservative Democrats, committed to greater transparency, is the best prescription for improvement beginning in January 2011.
• Central Massachusetts residents are fortunate to have an effective group of moderate state senators representing them. The Telegram & Gazette endorses Sen.Harriette L. Chandler in the 1st Worcester District, Sen. Stephen M. Brewer in the Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire & Franklin District, Sen.Jennifer L. Flanagan in the Worcester & Middlesex District, and Sen. Richard T. Moore in the Worcester & Norfolk District. They, along with Sen. Michael O. Moore in the 2nd Worcester District, who is not facing opposition this year, deserve re-election. While we have some differences of opinion regarding policy with these lawmakers, each has an unimpeachable record of constituent service. They understand the needs of the districts they serve, have exhibited common sense, and possess the all-important ability to strike effective compromises on legislation.
We are, nonetheless, gratified to see that in most cases these Democratic legislators have drawn challengers this year, which speaks to the strength of a reinvigorated Republican Party, as well as a healthy tea party movement in Massachusetts. We take particular note of Republican State Committeewoman Kim Roy of Sutton, who has staged a strong challenge to Mr. Moore with an articulate campaign focusing on cutting taxes, reforming pensions, and bringing balance to Beacon Hill. Such candidates contribute to democracy by keeping incumbents on their toes — and may well represent the next wave of political change in coming elections.
• With the 11 contested area races for the House of Representatives, voters have their best opportunity to restore some balance to the Legislature. The Telegram & Gazette endorses seven Republican and five Democratic candidates in these races.
Our choices among the Republicans are Kimberly N. Ferguson for the 1st Worcester seat being vacated by Rep. Lew Evangelidis; Richard Bastien for the 2nd Worcester seat being vacated by Rep. Robert L. Rice Jr.; incumbent Rep. George N. Peterson Jr. in the 9th Worcester; Matthew A. Beaton for the 11th Worcester seat being vacated by Karyn Polito; Paul J. Franco for the 13th Worcester seat being vacated by Rep. Robert Spellane; Steven L. Levy for the 4th Middlesex seat now held by Rep. Danielle W. Gregoire; and Kurt Hayes for the 37th Middlesex seat now held by Rep. Jennifer E. Benson.
Ms. Ferguson and Mr. Beaton are seeking seats that have been in Republican hands, while Mr. Bastien, Mr. Franco, Mr. Levy and Mr. Hayes are solid candidates who would help bring much-needed party balance to the House. Mr. Peterson, the House Minority Whip, has been a highly effective legislator on behalf of his district and deserves re-election.
Among the Democrats, we endorse incumbents Rep. Anne M. Gobi in the 5th Worcester, Rep. Geraldo Alicea in the 6th Worcester, Rep. Paul Kujawski in the 8th Worcester, Rep. Harold P. Naughton Jr. in the 12th Worcester, and Rep. Jennifer M. Callahan in the 18th Worcester. Each of these legislators has been attentive and effective, while avoiding the ideological extremism that characterizes some in the Legislature. Their independence, moderation and hard work merit the continued support of their constituents.
Debate is off in 13th Worcester
By Jacqueline Reis TELEGRAM & GAZETTE STAFF
jreis@telegram.com
WORCESTER — A debate that the Worcester Regional Chamber of Commerce and the Worcester chapter of Stand for Children were trying to organize for the three candidates running for state representative in the 13th Worcester District is a bust, leaving a candidates forum scheduled for Monday as the last time the three candidates are slated to meet before the election.
Paul Fenner, campaign coordinator for Democratic candidate John J. Mahoney, said Mr. Mahoney had already committed to attending a meeting with the Tatnuck Neighborhood Association about the Worcester Regional Airport that night.
Independent candidate Ronal C. Madnick was livid about losing a chance to debate. The veteran local ACLU leader and former Democrat did as much as he could during a rapid-fire radio debate last week but said, “I’m not a one-minute man; I’ve got a 40-year history.” He is trying to organize another debate.
The radio debate on the Peter Blute show on WCRN was the only one the candidates have had.
Republican candidate Paul J. Franco hoped to have four debates and was disappointed the chamber/Stand for Children debate didn’t work out. “We’re available” should another arise, said Christopher Pinto, Mr. Franco’s campaign manager.
Mr. Fenner said Mr. Mahoney is also open to another debate, but time is short before the Nov. 2 election.
Monday’s forum at 6 p.m. at the Worcester Youth Center is sponsored by the Pleasant Street Neighborhood Network Center and other organizations, according to the candidates.
